Opens in a new tab
needsahuman.
Search ⌘KGet the data

Will AI replace fishing and hunting workers?

1 job scored. On average 85% of the task time in these jobs still needs a person, and the family averages 84 out of 100 on Still needs a human, where higher is safer.

84
Average Still needs a human score, 0 to 100 ↑ safer. Will AI replace them? Nah.
1
Jobs scored in this family
85%
Average share of that still needs a person
—
US workers in these jobs

How the work could shift in Fishing and Hunting Workers

The share of US workers in these jobs whose job would sit in each band, from today to 2060.

Every job in Fishing and Hunting Workers, ranked

How to read a row: the number is the Still needs a human score, out of 100, higher is safer; “AI replace?” is our answer to “Will AI replace this job?”; the bar is the task split: white AI does it, grey AI helps, amber needs a human.

Fishing and Hunting WorkersFarming, Fishing, and Forestry · 45-3031
84↑ saferAI replace? Nah.
AI does 0%AI helps 15%Needs a human 85%
20572046–2060+