Opens in a new tab
needsahuman.

Will AI replace media and communication equipment workers?

7 jobs scored. On average 57% of the task time in these jobs still needs a person, and the family averages 74 out of 100 on Still needs a human, where higher is safer.

74
Average Still needs a human score, 0 to 100 ↑ safer. Will AI replace them? A little.
7
Jobs scored in this family
57%
Average share of that still needs a person
212k
US workers in these jobs

How the work could shift in Media and Communication Equipment Workers

The share of US workers in these jobs whose job would sit in each band, from today to 2060.

Today
4%
of US workers in this family are in jobs that mostly need a person (our top band, Nah.)
0% are in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)
By 2045
0%
of US workers in this family would still be in jobs that mostly need a person (our top band, Nah.)
69% would be in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)
By 2060
0%
of US workers in this family would still be in jobs that mostly need a person (our top band, Nah.)
96% would be in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)

Each job's score moves towards the bottom band (Largely: AI could largely do the job) by the year it could be largely automated, slowly at first and faster later, as adoption usually goes. Each job is run as ten scenarios across its replacement range, so every figure mixes early and late outcomes. The model stops at 2060. How the timeline works

Share of US workers in this family in each verdict band, today to 20600%25%50%75%100%2026: 4.2% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2026: 95.8% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)96%Today2030: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2030: 71.7% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)72%2030: 27.9% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could partly do (Partly.)28%20302035: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2035: 13.9% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)14%2035: 40.2% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could partly do (Partly.)40%2035: 37.3% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could mostly do (Mostly.)37%2035: 8.2% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)8%20352040: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2040: 4.1% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)2040: 19.6% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could partly do (Partly.)20%2040: 28.4% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could mostly do (Mostly.)28%2040: 47.5% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)48%20402045: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2045: 4.1% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)2045: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could partly do (Partly.)2045: 26.4% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could mostly do (Mostly.)26%2045: 68.7% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)69%20452050: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2050: 4.1% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)2050: 10.8% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could mostly do (Mostly.)11%2050: 84.7% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)85%20502055: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2055: 4.1% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)2055: 95.5% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)96%20552060: 0.4% of US workers in this family in jobs that mostly need a person (Nah.)2060: 4.1% of US workers in this family in jobs where AI could do a little of the work (A little.)2060: 95.5% of US workers in this family in jobs AI could largely do (Largely.)96%2060
Will AI replace the job?Largely.Mostly.Partly.A little.Nah.
Share of US workers in this family whose job would sit in each band, year by year. Updated with every release.
Show the data
YearLargelyMostlyPartlyA littleNah
Today (2026)0.0%0.0%0.0%95.8%4.2%
20300.0%0.0%27.9%71.7%0.4%
20358.2%37.3%40.2%13.9%0.4%
204047.5%28.4%19.6%4.1%0.4%
204568.7%26.4%0.4%4.1%0.4%
205084.7%10.8%0.0%4.1%0.4%
205595.5%0.0%0.0%4.1%0.4%
206095.5%0.0%0.0%4.1%0.4%

Every job in Media and Communication Equipment Workers, ranked

How to read a row: the number is the Still needs a human score, out of 100, higher is safer; “AI replace?” is our answer to “Will AI replace this job?”; the bar is the task split: white AI does it, grey AI helps, amber needs a human.

Film and Video EditorsArts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media · 27-4032
66↑ saferAI replace? A little.
AI does 4%AI helps 69%Needs a human 27%
20402036–2048
26k
$75,420
Audio and Video TechniciansArts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media · 27-4011
70↑ saferAI replace? A little.
AI does 2%AI helps 55%Needs a human 43%
20422037–2054
70k
$58,100
Broadcast TechniciansArts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media · 27-4012
71↑ saferAI replace? A little.
AI does 2%AI helps 56%Needs a human 42%
20432038–2055
21k
$59,570
PhotographersArts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media · 27-4021
75↑ saferAI replace? A little.
AI does 5%AI helps 26%Needs a human 69%
20442037–2060+
52k
$44,660
Sound Engineering TechniciansArts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media · 27-4014
76↑ saferAI replace? A little.
AI does 0%AI helps 39%Needs a human 61%
20452038–2060+
13k
$73,130
Camera Operators, Television, Video, and FilmArts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media · 27-4031
77↑ saferAI replace? A little.
AI does 0%AI helps 27%Needs a human 73%
20452038–2060+
22k
$74,990
Lighting TechniciansArts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media · 27-4015
81↑ saferAI replace? Nah.
AI does 0%AI helps 13%Needs a human 87%
20482038–2060+
9k
$68,060