Opens in a new tab
needsahuman.

Will AI replace clinical research coordinators?

A little.

This job scores 71 out of 100 on (higher is safer). Today AI could do about 3% of the work by itself, people do 68% with AI’s help, and 29% still needs a person.

Updated 3 October 2026 11-9121.01 2440 2026-Q4
ManagementClinical Research Coordinators11-9121.01 · 2026-Q4
3% AI does it68% AI helps29% needs a human
Your job's name, lit by the work that still needs a human.Needs a human 29%AI helps 68%AI does it 3%

AI does it: AI can do the task largely by itself. AI helps: a person still does it, faster with AI. Needs a human: AI can do little of it yet.

Each ridge is a slice of the job's task time.Needs a human 29%AI helps 68%AI does it 3%
The job’s mark

No two jobs leave the same print

Every job gets its own fingerprint, drawn from its code. The amber ridges are the share of task time that still needs a person. Below them, the same ridges are written out in ones and zeros: slate for the work AI helps with, white for the work AI can do.

Clinical Research Coordinators, O*NET-SOC 11-9121.01. 29% of the job’s task time still needs a human, so 29 of every 100 ridges are amber; slate is what AI helps with, white what AI can do.

What AI can and cannot do

The tasks that make up the job, from , and where AI stands on each today: , (a person does it, with AI speeding it up) or . 29% of the still needs a human.

Each block is one task; its height is its share of working time.Needs a human 29%AI helps 68%AI does it 3%
The job's task list: the parts AI can do are blacked out.Needs a human 29%AI helps 68%AI does it 3%
Schedule subjects for appointments, procedures, or inpatient stays as required by study protocols.AI helps
Perform specific protocol procedures such as interviewing subjects, taking vital signs, and performing electrocardiograms.Needs a human
Assess eligibility of potential subjects through methods such as screening interviews, reviews of medical records, or discussions with physicians and nurses.AI helps
Prepare study-related documentation, such as protocol worksheets, procedural manuals, adverse event reports, institutional review board documents, or progress reports.AI helps
Inform patients or caregivers about study aspects and outcomes to be expected.AI helps
Record adverse event and side effect data and confer with investigators regarding the reporting of events to oversight agencies.AI helps
Monitor study activities to ensure compliance with protocols and with all relevant local, federal, and state regulatory and institutional polices.AI helps
Oversee subject enrollment to ensure that informed consent is properly obtained and documented.Needs a human
Maintain required records of study activity including case report forms, drug dispensation records, or regulatory forms.AI helps
Identify protocol problems, inform investigators of problems, or assist in problem resolution efforts, such as protocol revisions.AI helps
Review proposed study protocols to evaluate factors such as sample collection processes, data management plans, or potential subject risks.AI helps
Collaborate with investigators to prepare presentations or reports of clinical study procedures, results, and conclusions.AI helps
Track enrollment status of subjects and document dropout information such as dropout causes and subject contact efforts.AI helps
Code, evaluate, or interpret collected study data.AI does it
Direct the requisition, collection, labeling, storage, or shipment of specimens.Needs a human
Instruct research staff in scientific and procedural aspects of studies including standards of care, informed consent procedures, or documentation procedures.Needs a human
Maintain contact with sponsors to schedule and coordinate site visits or to answer questions about issues such as incomplete data.AI helps
Prepare for or participate in quality assurance audits conducted by study sponsors, federal agencies, or specially designated review groups.Needs a human
Order drugs or devices necessary for study completion.AI helps
Contact outside health care providers and communicate with subjects to obtain follow-up information.AI helps
Participate in the development of study protocols including guidelines for administration or data collection procedures.Needs a human
Confer with health care professionals to determine the best recruitment practices for studies.Needs a human
Communicate with laboratories or investigators regarding laboratory findings.AI helps
Review scientific literature, participate in continuing education activities, or attend conferences and seminars to maintain current knowledge of clinical studies affairs and issues.AI helps
Organize space for study equipment and supplies.Needs a human
Develop advertising and other informational materials to be used in subject recruitment.AI helps
Dispense medical devices or drugs, and calculate dosages and provide instructions as necessary.Needs a human
Arrange for research study sites and determine staff or equipment availability.AI helps
Interpret protocols and advise treating physicians on appropriate dosage modifications or treatment calculations based on patient characteristics.AI helps
Contact industry representatives to ensure equipment and software specifications necessary for successful study completion.AI helps
Register protocol patients with appropriate statistical centers as required.AI helps
Solicit industry-sponsored trials through contacts and professional organizations.Needs a human
Participate in preparation and management of research budgets and monetary disbursements.AI helps

Is it better than a person? The evidence

No direct test against people in this job yet. Every study is , and vendor studies are labelled as such.

When could it be replaced?

When AI could largely do this job: 2037–2052

Most likely between 2037 and 2052 (8 in 10 of our scenarios). A range from our of how fast AI improves, how fast employers take it up and what holds it back, not a forecast that the job ends. “” has a strict meaning here. Today’s answer is at the top of the page; this is how it could change.

The sand is the human working years left, measured in the same 40-year glass for every job, so a safe trade starts nearly full and an exposed job with a thin layer.

The sand is the human working years left, in the same 40-year glass for every job.Years still needing a humanYears run out

How this job could shift, year by year

Where the job could sit on our scale each year to 2060, across the ten behind its .

Today
Will AI replace this job?
A little.
By 2045
80%
of our scenarios have AI largely doing this job by 2045 (Largely.)
0% still have it mostly needing a person (A little. or Nah.)
By 2060
100%
of our scenarios have AI largely doing this job by 2060 (Largely.)
0% still have it mostly needing a person (A little. or Nah.)

We run this job as ten scenarios spread across its replacement range. In each, the score moves towards the bottom band (Largely: AI could largely do the job) by the year that scenario reaches it, slowly at first and faster later, as adoption usually goes. Each bar splits the ten by the band they put the job in. The model stops at 2060. How the timeline works

Share of this job's scenarios in each verdict band, today to 20600%25%50%75%100%2026: 100.0% of scenarios: AI could do a little of this job (A little.)100%Today2030: 60.0% of scenarios: AI could do a little of this job (A little.)60%2030: 40.0% of scenarios: AI could partly do this job (Partly.)40%20302035: 40.0% of scenarios: AI could partly do this job (Partly.)40%2035: 50.0% of scenarios: AI could mostly do this job (Mostly.)50%2035: 10.0% of scenarios: AI could largely do this job (Largely.)10%20352040: 10.0% of scenarios: AI could partly do this job (Partly.)10%2040: 30.0% of scenarios: AI could mostly do this job (Mostly.)30%2040: 60.0% of scenarios: AI could largely do this job (Largely.)60%20402045: 20.0% of scenarios: AI could mostly do this job (Mostly.)20%2045: 80.0% of scenarios: AI could largely do this job (Largely.)80%20452050: 100.0% of scenarios: AI could largely do this job (Largely.)100%20502055: 100.0% of scenarios: AI could largely do this job (Largely.)100%20552060: 100.0% of scenarios: AI could largely do this job (Largely.)100%2060
Will AI replace the job?Largely.Mostly.Partly.A little.Nah.
Share of this job's scenarios in each band, year by year. Updated with every release.
Show the data
YearLargelyMostlyPartlyA littleNah
Today (2026)0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%
20300.0%0.0%40.0%60.0%0.0%
203510.0%50.0%40.0%0.0%0.0%
204060.0%30.0%10.0%0.0%0.0%
204580.0%20.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
2050100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
2055100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
2060100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%

What’s stopping AI taking over?

The things that keep this work with people, strongest first. Each is scored 0 to 100 from work context, licensing and the evidence we have.

Clients want a personFace-to-face contact is rated 4.9 and physical closeness 3.4 out of 5; caring for or serving people is 3.5 out of 5 in importance.
LiabilityMistakes are rated 2.7 out of 5 for consequence and decisions 3.7 out of 5 for impact; someone has to answer for them.
Evidence gapNo study yet compares AI with people doing this job, so employers have no proof it is good enough.
LicensingUsual entry requirement (BLS): bachelor's degree.
RegulationWorkers rate responsibility for others' health and safety 3.0 out of 5.
Physical work14% of the task time is physical; robots have been shown on 69% of that time.

What would it cost to hand the work to AI?

The share of the year AI could handle (620 of 2,080 hours a year), priced two ways. Both are ranges, not quotes.

AI model usage, a year
$60–$6,200
A person’s wage for the same hours
$23,750–$94,420

AI cost covers model usage only: no integration, licences, oversight or the human time still needed to review the work. Human cost is the wage for the same hours, without benefits or overheads. As of 2026-10.

Robots and humanoids

AI software can only take the work at a screen. The rest needs a robot that can do it.

14%
of the task time is physical work
Dexterous humanoid
the kind of robot the physical work would need
Not commercial: no cited robot does most of this work; humanoids are at demonstration and pilot stage.

Source: Anthropic Economic Index, 'What work can robots do?' (30 September 2026); O*NET 31.0 task weights.

Which AI skills does this job lean on?

The job’s task time split by what an AI model would need to be good at, and where models stand today.

Each star is a task, grouped by the AI skill it leans on.Needs a human 29%AI helps 68%AI does it 3%
Writing · 25.5% of time
Strong
Drafts, edits and translates most routine documents at professional quality.
Analysis · 24.8% of time
Strong
Reliable on structured data and rules; uneven on judgement calls with thin information.
Coding · 0% of time
Strong
Agents complete many routine software tasks end to end; larger systems still need people.
Vision and design · 0% of time
Good
Reads documents, images and layouts well; specialist imaging needs dedicated, approved tools.
Speech · 3.1% of time
Good
Voice agents handle routine calls and live interpreting; complex or sensitive calls still go to people.
Planning and agents · 21% of time
Emerging
Multi-step agents work in narrow, well-tooled workflows; open-ended coordination is unreliable.
Physical manipulation · 10.6% of time
Early
Robots handle structured, repetitive handling; general dexterity outside fixed settings is not commercial.
Care and persuasion · 15% of time
Limited
Can script, coach and advise; trust, presence and accountability still need a person.
Amber matter holds its orbit, slate circles the inner disc, white falls in.Needs a human 29%AI helps 68%AI does it 3%
How exposed is it?

Still needs a human: 71/100↑ safer

The amber matter on the outside holds its orbit: that is the task time that still needs a person. The slate matter circling the inner disc is the work AI helps with. The white matter is the share AI can do; it spirals in and is gone over the edge.

The matter follows the job’s task split: 29% needs a human, 68% AI helps, 3% AI does it. Still needs a human: 71/100 ↑ safer. Will AI replace them? A little.

What the AIs say

We asked four AI assistants the same question: will AI replace this job in the next 10 years? One word (Yes, Partly or No), then one sentence. Our own answer, from the data: Still needs a human: 71/100 ↑ safer. Will AI replace them? A little.

ChatGPTPartly

AI will automate many administrative, data-entry, scheduling, and monitoring tasks, but clinical research coordinators will still be needed for patient interaction, ethical oversight, protocol judgment, and site-level problem solving.

gpt-5.5-2026-04-23 · asked 2026-10-03
ClaudePartly

AI will automate many administrative and data-management tasks of the role, but clinical research coordinators will still be needed for patient interaction, judgment calls, and regulatory oversight.

claude-sonnet-5 · asked 2026-10-03
GeminiPartly

While AI will automate routine administrative tasks like data entry, scheduling, and protocol matching, it cannot replace the essential human elements of empathetic patient care, complex clinical judgment, and in-person trial oversight.

gemini-3.8-flash · asked 2026-10-03
PerplexityPartly

AI will likely automate substantial administrative work and reduce some staffing needs, but human coordinators will remain essential for patient relationships, ethical judgment, and regulatory accountability.

sonar · asked 2026-10-03

Assistants answer from what they learned in training (Perplexity also searches the web), so they can be confidently wrong, and the same question can get a different answer tomorrow. Our score is built from task data and graded evidence. Answers collected through DataForSEO.

Cite this page

NeedsAHuman.com (2026). Will AI replace Clinical Research Coordinators? A little. Still needs a human: 71/100, higher is safer; release 2026-Q4. https://needsahuman.com/jobs/clinical-research-coordinators/ (accessed 4 October 2026).

Scores change with each , so cite the release. The data is open under : credit NeedsAHuman.com with a link. Open data · Press

Put the badge on your site

The badge updates itself with each release and links back to this page.

Sources

  • Tasks and work context: 31.0, ().
  • Jobs, pay and projections: US , and 2025–35.
  • How AI is used today: ; Microsoft Research, .
  • What AI can do: our task ratings ( r1) and the quality evidence register.
  • UK names and employment: coding index and .

How each score is built: methodology. Every figure on this page: open data. Release 2026-Q4.